Enter your email address to receive new posts in your inbox:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Like what you see? Share!


DISCLAIMER: This blog is published for general information only - it is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice. While we welcome you to contact our authors, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you.

Entries in Smart Meters (11)


Energy News Roundup: March 23-March 29

This week in regional energy news …


Energy News Roundup: February 2-February 8

This week in regional energy news …


Energy News Roundup: January 19-January 25

This week in regional energy news …


Energy News Roundup: July 28-August 3

This week in regional energy news …


Energy News Roundup: July 21-July 27


Maine Supreme Judicial Court Finds Health and Safety Concerns of CMP Smart-Meters Unresolved by MPUC 

Today, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the Maine Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) erred by not resolving health and safety concerns raised by some Central Maine Power Company (CMP) customers in relation to CMP’s wireless “smart-meter” technology. (Friedman v. PUC, 2012 ME 90). 

The Court rejected several arguments made by the customers related to privacy, trespass and constitutional issues.  The Court found that while the MPUC considered the health and safety concerns to some extent, it failed to resolve the concerns or determine whether CMP’s smart-meter technology is safe.  The Court remanded the case to the MPUC for further proceedings to address the health and safety concerns raised. 


Smart Meter Opt-Out for CMP Customers Approved by MPUC

During Tuesday’s deliberations, the Maine Public Utilities Commission approved smart meter opt-out options for Central Maine Power customers.  The Commission approved two smart meter opt-out options: (1) the option of installing a smart meter with its transmitter turned off and (2) the ability to retain the existing analog meter.  Additionally, customers may choose to relocate smart meters to a different location on the customer’s property, at the customer’s expense.

Both opt-out choices come with costs that must be paid by the customers who select to opt out.  Choosing a digital smart meter with the wireless transmitter turned off will carry an initial charge of $20, plus a $10.50 monthly charge.  Retaining an existing mechanical meter will cost $40 initially, plus a $12 monthly charge.  Low-income residents may qualify for a 50% subsidy of the opt-out cost.  Depending on how many customers ultimately choose something other than a standard smart meter, the costs may be adjusted in the future. So far, an estimated 1% of all customers have asked not to have the new meters installed at their homes and businesses.

Commissioner Vafiades emphasized the need to move forward by shifting the focus to the benefits of smart meters, while allowing those who reject smart meters to opt out: “Based on sound public policy, as allowed by statute and taking into consideration all public correspondence and filings, we conclude that offering a smart meter opt-out options is reasonable and in the public interest. For the long term success of smart meter implementation and to maximize its potential to the fullest, the public needs to be actively engaged in monitoring their usage and real-time price of electricity and modifying their behavior accordingly. To achieve this goal, we need to shift the focus to the benefits of smart meters and allow the small minority to opt out.”

Commissioner Littell noted the Commission’s thorough review of customer concerns and the range of options now available: “We have reviewed every filing, every complaint and every letter sent to this Commission regarding smart meters. Based on our review, we conclude that any CMP residential or small commercial customer should have four choices: 1) the default smart meter which will become the standard meter in CMP territory; 2) the ability to select a smart meter with the transmitter-off; 3) the ability to keep the customer’s existing analog meter; or, 4) the ability to move the new smart meters elsewhere on their property at the customer’s expense.”